Introduce characters / Greet readers / Write as you like. You can type it here...

Because there are many people who close their eyes and criticize Buddhism. After the internal meeting We therefore agree that It is necessary to bring basic information about the 5 precepts that no one in front of you has come out to talk about. Whether it's those who close their eyes to praise or those who close their ears to destroy religion. In order to have a common understanding everywhere.

Components and principles for consideration in violating the 5 precepts

1.Pāṇātipāta (

Panatipat)-

about killing

The principle of determining whether it is wrong or not

1 The animal is alive.

2 Know that animals are alive.

3. Having the mind (intention) to kill.

4 attempted murder

5 The animal died because of that effort.

(If all 5 points are complete, it is considered that the precepts are lacking because intention is the cause. If you don't complete the precepts, you'll just be tainted.)

But in all this, how much will it be wrong? Must be considered together with the animals that are killed as follows.

1. Killing animals that are possessed by a possessive owner - the more possessive the owner is, the more wrong it is. And it is also a way to bind karma and create resentment (you don't have to wait across the country to see results).

2. Kill animals that have merit - both benefits to humans as humans and to the herd as leaders. Killing animals that have a clear benefit to humans is that humans will lose their own benefits, such as killing animals that can help find food in the short term. You may actually get that meat to eat, but in the future

Who will help me find food? Likewise, killing the herd leader leaves the herd without a leader. and scattered In the end, they may come down on humans who kill them (the ecosystem itself will be damaged as well).

3. Killing large animals - Killing large animals requires a lot of effort. Not including the benefits that may be gained from the animal as well. Big animals have great strength. If that power can be used by humans for benefit. Killing will sooner or later have negative consequences for human society itself.

4. Killing your own animals - animals that humans look after until they develop trust. Loyal to the caregiver But the shepherd himself betrayed and killed the animal. It shows the abnormality of the mind of the caretaker who is unkind, deceitful, and dangerous to society.

5. Kill animals whose owners cannot be found - If we do not know the origin or history of the animal, we should not risk killing it. Because danger may come to oneself, such as the killing of the giant albino eel of the Yonok region. Killings without careful consideration by the ruling cabinet led to the downfall of the entire province. Even though the giant eel was fleeing from a huge earthquake. But humans didn't realize it and so the whole land died.

When considered, it will be found that Killing animals that are beneficial to both humans and nature is the most wrong. On the other hand, if that animal does not bring any benefit and creates harm to humans and nature, Kill it before it does worse than it already does. Stop its vicious cycle.

2. Adinnathan (

Adinnadan)-

Concerning theft

The principle of determining whether it is wrong or not

1 That thing is owned by a jealous owner.

2 Know that the item is owned by a jealous owner.

3 with intent to steal

4 tried to steal

5 The thing was obtained because of that effort.

(If all 5 points are complete, it is considered that the precepts are lacking because intention is the cause. If you don't complete the precepts, you'll just be tainted.)

But in all this, how much will it be wrong? must be considered together with the stolen items, namely

How much is the stolen object worth? Having a lot of value means having a lot of sin (both physical and mental).

3. Kamesu micchacara (

Kamesumicchacara)-

Regarding sexual harassment

The principle of determining whether it is wrong or not

1. That person is a prohibited person.

2. Has intent to violate

3. Attempt to violate

4. The trespass was successful from that attempt (even trespassing as little as a sesame seed is wrong).

(If all 4 points are complete, it is considered that the precepts are lacking because intention is the cause. If you don't complete the precepts, you'll just be tainted.)

But in all this, how much will it be wrong? Must consider together with the person who offends as follows:

1. A woman who is already owned Including women who rent for the night (beautiful women of the city) are considered to have owners (for this reason the Vajjī region enacted laws to protect women and appointed the position of beautiful women of the city (model: Mrs. Ambapali) until they could earn income for the region. enormously)

2. Women who have guardians such as father, mother, relatives, etc.

3. Women who are prohibited by tradition, relatives, women protected by religion (female priests), widows in law (today there probably aren't any)

But overall, the things that are forbidden here are both men and women.

4. Musavadha (

Musavad)-

Concerning lies

The principle of determining whether it is wrong or not

1. The story shown is untrue.

2. Intentionally misrepresent

3. Try to show that something is wrong.

4. Other people understand the content.

(If all 4 points are complete, it is considered that the precepts are lacking because intention is the cause. If you don't complete the precepts, you'll just be tainted.)

But in all this, how much will it be wrong? must be considered together with the person who offends, namely

How damaging is the story shown? Causing damage is a great sin (both physical and mental damage).

Conversely, what if the false story benefits the public? Is it worth overlooking? (Black truth vs. white lie)

5. Suramerayamajjapamathatthana (

Suramerayamaccapamadatthan)-

Concerning intoxicating substances

The principle of determining whether it is wrong or not

1. That object makes you drunk.

2. Have the intention to drink

3. Try to drink

4. The object passed down the throat because of that effort.

(If all 4 points are complete, it is considered that the precepts are lacking because intention is the cause. If you don't complete the precepts, you'll just be tainted.)

This point does not have to be considered together with anything at all. Because drunk people can do anything. If you're wrong on just this one, the other 4 are all wrong.

In addition, the precepts were established for human beings to live together as a society at all levels. From a small society to a large society, and sāla means normalcy. When sāla is related to society, sāla means normalcy of society. Therefore, sāla is not just a tool for self-reflection. But precepts are also a consideration for society.

By allowing the public in that society to use precepts as a tool to check the behavior and conduct of people in that society. What society is immoral? That society is considered abnormal!!!

https://www.facebook.com/notes/%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9D%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C-%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%88%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B3%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A5-%E0%B9%95-%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A4%E0%B8%A9%E0%B8%8E%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%99basic/384382465024235